SCCAForums.com

SCCA Racing Forums, Discussions and Blogs

Welcome to SCCAForums.com Sign in | Join | Latest Posts | My Posts | Help
in Search

STi vs. 135

Last post 04-23-2008, 10:58 AM by murph1379. 85 replies.
Page 1 of 5 (86 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  12-28-2007, 9:21 AM 278357

    STi vs. 135

    Looking at the specs for the new STi a couple things struck me:

    1) the price! $35k??? so 305hp subaru vs. 300hp BMW.... same price.

    2) the weight! It actually weighs as much as a BMW, and I'm sure doesn't have the balance of a BMW 

    3) the design looks very much like a cross between the E46 (headlights) and 135 (taillights) and a Mazdaspeed Protege.

     
    For autocross purposes, it still has AWD, an extra half inch of wheel, better diffs, and probably better springs, but I'll be surprised if it compares well in the marketplace.
     


    DS #313 | the rolling couch of doom | La-Z-Boy Racing
  •  12-28-2007, 9:36 AM 278360 in reply to 278357

    Re: STi vs. 135

    1. Yeah, kind of surprising.  Considering all the technology in the Suburu, AWD, diffs, etc., I would expect the BMW to be cheaperSmile

    2. See above but change cheaper to lighter.

    3. I like it. 

    Not staying in DS?

  •  12-28-2007, 10:05 AM 278364 in reply to 278360

    Re: STi vs. 135

    we,ve got to stop meeting like this ......other MAC members will talkl
  •  12-28-2007, 10:39 AM 278371 in reply to 278360

    Re: STi vs. 135

    eh, the BMW's are aimed at the luxury market, if Subaru wants to charge BMW prices they should start taking some cues from Lexus...

    No idea about DS, I can't imagine why they would do that, but I'm guessing it all depends on the 135's spring rates and camber...
     


    DS #313 | the rolling couch of doom | La-Z-Boy Racing
  •  12-29-2007, 2:21 PM 278514 in reply to 278371

    Re: STi vs. 135

    Will these both fall in the A-Stock class?

  •  12-31-2007, 1:42 PM 278716 in reply to 278514

    Re: STi vs. 135

    cmamich:

    Will these both fall in the A-Stock class?

    Should be.

    Figure the STi will probably be a good car, especially at Pros. 

    The BMW will be a bigtime also-ran, given that it's a heavy, one-wheel drive car with no camber. 


    John Vitamvas
    stranoparts.com / TeamWTF.org '04 Z06
  •  12-31-2007, 2:04 PM 278720 in reply to 278716

    Re: STi vs. 135

    The BMW will be a bigtime also-ran, given that it's a heavy, one-wheel drive car with no camber.  

     Wow... sounds like my Cobalt, except for the "Bigtime also ran" part...

    Interested to see what AS looks like this year with those 2 in there.


    Brian Huber
    06 Cobalt SS-SC (retired to DD Duty )
    02 Z06 ( Whole new ball o' wax )
    #??SS

  •  01-04-2008, 4:47 PM 279189 in reply to 278360

    Re: STi vs. 135

    aansorge:

    1. Yeah, kind of surprising.  Considering all the technology in the Suburu, AWD, diffs, etc., I would expect the BMW to be cheaperSmile

    2. See above but change cheaper to lighter.

    3. I like it. 

    Not staying in DS?

     

    So the BMW does not have a lot of technology in it? hrmm... 


    00' 328Ci
    01' Tahoe LT
    98' Camaro Z28 - dead
    95' 325is - STX 182

  •  01-04-2008, 11:18 PM 279238 in reply to 279189

    Re: STi vs. 135

    Sure, the BMW has loads of technology.


    Problem is that very little of it goes into making the car faster.


    John Vitamvas
    stranoparts.com / TeamWTF.org '04 Z06
  •  01-05-2008, 12:27 AM 279246 in reply to 279238

    Re: STi vs. 135

    No LSD in the BMW.....it controls traction in the back with the brakes.  This sounds like a show stopper in stock class.
  •  01-05-2008, 1:12 PM 279293 in reply to 279246

    Re: STi vs. 135

    prostcj:
    No LSD in the BMW.....it controls traction in the back with the brakes.  This sounds like a show stopper in stock class.

    I agree -- I think the car would be cannon fodder in A Stock.  Problem is, its huge power would create big course dependencies in B Stock; I think it might be too fast for F Stock, and it would probably kill D Stock.  Tough car to class -- I'd probably put it in F Stock, especially since the similarly powerful Shelby raised the bar there last year.

  •  01-06-2008, 9:45 AM 279365 in reply to 279293

    Re: STi vs. 135

    PedalFaster:

    prostcj:
    No LSD in the BMW.....it controls traction in the back with the brakes.  This sounds like a show stopper in stock class.

    I agree -- I think the car would be cannon fodder in A Stock.  Problem is, its huge power would create big course dependencies in B Stock; I think it might be too fast for F Stock, and it would probably kill D Stock.  Tough car to class -- I'd probably put it in F Stock, especially since the similarly powerful Shelby raised the bar there last year.

    I tend to think F Stock is the place it belongs as well.  It'll be buried in A Stock.


    John Vitamvas
    stranoparts.com / TeamWTF.org '04 Z06
  •  01-06-2008, 2:00 PM 279375 in reply to 279246

    Re: STi vs. 135

    prostcj:
    No LSD in the BMW.....it controls traction in the back with the brakes.  This sounds like a show stopper in stock class.

    If it controls wheelspin by applying only the brake on the tire that is spinning, and provided the software is appropriately programmed, I honestly don't think the lack of a conventional LSD is a deal breaker. I don't know all the details on this brake assisted "LSD", but if implemented correctly it could be better then any of the conventional LSD's. On the other hand, if it is implemented poorly and/or gets disabled when you turn off the TC, then yeah, deal breaker.


    Nate Whipple
    NER
    188/88 DSP ITR
  •  01-06-2008, 7:18 PM 279396 in reply to 279375

    Re: STi vs. 135

    solo-x:

    If it controls wheelspin by applying only the brake on the tire that is spinning, and provided the software is appropriately programmed, I honestly don't think the lack of a conventional LSD is a deal breaker.

    The 3-Series' "virtual LSD" is ineffective -- why do you think the 1-Series' will be any different? 

  •  01-06-2008, 8:03 PM 279403 in reply to 279396

    Re: STi vs. 135

    After my adventure with the 330i ('05 with ZHP), a slip DOES make difference. Without a slip the car is an also ran, with it, and it is a contender. Ask the guys in the Integras. Sad
    Matt Murray

    I am perfectly capable of learning from my mistakes. I will surely learn a great deal today.
  •  01-06-2008, 10:28 PM 279418 in reply to 279403

    Re: STi vs. 135

    The difference between theory and application I guess. Seems to me it shouldn't be too hard to program the virtual LSD to work better then even a s00per p1mp 2-way clutch type. Finally, an LSD option that could bias 100% of the torque to one axle that isn't axle speed differential dependant. Of course, the engineers have to have Solo performance in mind when they program the LSD to allow that 10-12% slip and apply brake to ONLY the wheel that is spinning.

    Now, just because this technology on the 3-series is crummy for solo doesn't automatically mean the next iteration in the 1-series will be equally as crummy. Certainly doesn't bode well though.

    Matt, drop me an email and explain what happened with the 330 and it's psuedo lsd. Just curious how it drove compared to one with a conventional LSD.

    Nate - doesn't get to play with the fancy new electronic gizmo's


    Nate Whipple
    NER
    188/88 DSP ITR
  •  01-06-2008, 10:49 PM 279421 in reply to 279418

    Re: STi vs. 135

    I think the difference is a real LSD will always put power down through one of the wheels, if it is a good one it gives power to the wheel with grip.
     
    A "virtual LSD" only slows down the spinning wheel, it does nothing to apply more power to the wheel with grip. So while the V-LSD might help to stop the endless one-leggin, it will not help you accelerate by transferring power to the other tire, it is still an open diff.
     
    I think the 135 might have a shot in HS. Embarrassed

    Jason Isley
    2005-2006-2007-2008 B Stock National Champion
  •  01-06-2008, 10:53 PM 279423 in reply to 279421

    Re: STi vs. 135

    With 9" wide wheels, fat RE01R's, a good LSD and all the other STU allowances the 135 could be a contender.  Without them DS is where I think it should be. 

    BS RX8
  •  01-06-2008, 11:33 PM 279425 in reply to 278514

    Re: STi vs. 135

    cmamich:
    Will these both fall in the A-Stock class?

    I doubt the 135 will go to AS.  Until we actually get our hands on one, BS, DS and I suppose FS are all possibilities.

    With 9" wide wheels, fat RE01R's, a good LSD and all the other STU allowances the 135 could be a contender.

    Are twin turbo's allowed in STU? 

    Jeff 

  •  01-07-2008, 2:13 AM 279435 in reply to 279425

    Re: STi vs. 135

    cashmo:

    Are twin turbo's allowed in STU? 

    Jeff 

    No. 


    2002 Mercedes C230k, retired, 2005 Nationals STU DFL

    1969 Beach Solo Vee and 1985 Lynx B Solo Vee
Page 1 of 5 (86 items)   1 2 3 4 5 Next >
View as RSS news feed in XML