SCCAForums.com

SCCA Racing Forums, Discussions and Blogs

Welcome to SCCAForums.com Sign in | Join | Latest Posts | My Posts | Help
in Search

Splitter Clarifications

Last post 04-30-2008, 6:49 AM by Joe_914. 38 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (39 items)   < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  02-13-2008, 8:35 AM 284923 in reply to 284914

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    ErikZ06:

    Julia,

    That picture shows a splitter not conforming to the rules, but Vic may have trimmed things down since that picture. 

    Erik

    Agreed:

     M. Front splitters are allowed and shall be installed parallel to the ground (within +/-3 degrees fore to aft) and may extend a maximum of 6 inches forward of the front bodywork/fascia as viewed from above. Splitters may not extend rearward past the centerline of the front wheels. No portion of the splitter may extend beyond the widest part of the front bumper/fascia as viewed from above.


    Patrick Washburn
    STU Evo
    www.winghats.com
  •  02-13-2008, 10:13 AM 284943 in reply to 284923

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    Thanx guys.  This answers my questions and I am going to use approach A from my first post.

     

    Julia 


    Julia Aebersold
    97 SM
    97 Supra Turbo
  •  02-13-2008, 12:35 PM 284962 in reply to 284943

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    It's actually hard to tell in the picture of Vic's car as it is a bad angle.   You'd really need to look at it from above, as the bodywork right at the splitter might be farther in than above. 

    -Andy M.

  •  02-13-2008, 1:54 PM 284978 in reply to 284962

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    boxboy:

    It's actually hard to tell in the picture of Vic's car as it is a bad angle.   You'd really need to look at it from above, as the bodywork right at the splitter might be farther in than above. 

    -Andy M.

    Thanks Andy ;-)

    Some of you guys need to apply for the SMAC, we could have used the different points of views you all have. ;-)

    So when we wrote this (cough) LAME rule my car was the only one with a real splitter. So when I envisioned the rule as we wrote it I was thinking of B and MAYBE even C, But for sure NOT A. A is reading WAY to much into it. With B you could take a ruler and go to any point of the bumper/facia and measure 6" out on any part of the FRONT bumper. DONE! I guess we need to clarify this officially.
     


    Vic Sias
    650-704-0771
  •  02-13-2008, 2:42 PM 284985 in reply to 284978

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    siastuning:
    ...So when I envisioned the rule as we wrote it I was thinking of B and MAYBE even C, But for sure NOT A. ... I guess we need to clarify this officially.
     

     Go for it. D-Mod, E-Mod and X-Prepared all use the exact same language. I'd ASSUME that a clarification of the language used for SM would apply equally to the other classes that used the same phrase in their ruleset. I could use a pancake spatual splitter on the front of the Europa.

    Vic, what do I have to do to make sure you are on the protest committee? Cool


    Aut tace aut loquere meliora silentio.
  •  02-13-2008, 7:31 PM 285018 in reply to 284978

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    siastuning:
    boxboy:

    It's actually hard to tell in the picture of Vic's car as it is a bad angle.   You'd really need to look at it from above, as the bodywork right at the splitter might be farther in than above. 

    -Andy M.

    Thanks Andy ;-)

    Some of you guys need to apply for the SMAC, we could have used the different points of views you all have. ;-)

    So when we wrote this (cough) LAME rule my car was the only one with a real splitter. So when I envisioned the rule as we wrote it I was thinking of B and MAYBE even C, But for sure NOT A. A is reading WAY to much into it. With B you could take a ruler and go to any point of the bumper/facia and measure 6" out on any part of the FRONT bumper. DONE! I guess we need to clarify this officially.
     

     

    Well, the plot thickens.  I guess I won't go cutting just yet...   Thanx for the history Vic.


    Julia Aebersold
    97 SM
    97 Supra Turbo
  •  02-17-2008, 9:53 AM 285485 in reply to 285018

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    I spoke with Doug Gill last Friday and pointed out the discussion and various interpretations of the rule.  Per my request he will be sending all of various interpretations and the discussion on this thread to the SEB where they will render a clarification.

     

    Julia 


    Julia Aebersold
    97 SM
    97 Supra Turbo
  •  02-18-2008, 1:54 AM 285554 in reply to 285485

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    Julia, the SMAC did discuss this on our last conference call and had a suggested clarification for the SEB.   Without rewriting the rule more specifically, all we can really do is suggest a minor rewording that could possibly result in something more like "B", which was the majority view on the SMAC. 

     -Andy M.

  •  02-18-2008, 12:49 PM 285601 in reply to 285554

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    Thank you Andy.  I'm glad to hear the ball is already rolling.  Maybe a small rewording could entail the following.

    Front splitters are allowed and shall be installed parallel to the ground (within +/-3 degrees fore to aft) and may extend a maximum of 6 inches measured forward and radially from the front bodywork/fascia as viewed from above. Splitters may not extend rearward past the centerline of the front wheels. No portion of the splitter may extend beyond the widest part of the front bumper/fascia as viewed from above.

     

    Julia 

     


    Julia Aebersold
    97 SM
    97 Supra Turbo
  •  02-18-2008, 1:15 PM 285606 in reply to 285601

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    Here's a version with a couple less words:

     

    Front splitters are allowed and shall be installed parallel to the ground (within +/-3 degrees fore to aft) and may extend a maximum of 6 inches perpendicular from the front bodywork/fascia as viewed from above. Splitters may not extend rearward past the centerline of the front wheels. No portion of the splitter may extend beyond the widest part of the front bumper/fascia as viewed from above.


    Patrick Washburn
    STU Evo
    www.winghats.com
  •  02-18-2008, 10:16 PM 285703 in reply to 284978

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    siastuning:
    Some of you guys need to apply for the SMAC...

    No kidding. :)


    Randy Noll
  •  02-21-2008, 2:30 PM 286211 in reply to 285703

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    Here is one in support of "C".

     M. Front splitters are allowed and shall be installed parallel to the ground (within +/-3 degrees fore to aft) and may extend a maximum of 6 inches forward of the frontmost portion of the bodywork/fascia as viewed from above. Splitters may not extend rearward past the centerline of the front wheels. No portion of the splitter may extend beyond the widest part of the front bumper/fascia as viewed from above.

    And here is a new idea:

     M. Front splitters are allowed and shall be installed parallel to the ground (within +/-3 degrees fore to aft) and may extend a maximum of 6 inches forward of the frontmost portion of the front bodywork/fascia as viewed from above. Splitters may not extend rearward past the centerline of the front wheels. No portion of the splitter may extend beyond the widest part of the front bumper/fascia or front wheel/tire as viewed from above (which ever is wider).

    I like that one best!!

  •  02-22-2008, 10:29 PM 286412 in reply to 286211

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    EVOlutionary:

    Here is one in support of "C".

     M. Front splitters are allowed and shall be installed parallel to the ground (within +/-3 degrees fore to aft) and may extend a maximum of 6 inches forward of the frontmost portion of the bodywork/fascia as viewed from above. Splitters may not extend rearward past the centerline of the front wheels. No portion of the splitter may extend beyond the widest part of the front bumper/fascia as viewed from above.

    And here is a new idea:

     M. Front splitters are allowed and shall be installed parallel to the ground (within +/-3 degrees fore to aft) and may extend a maximum of 6 inches forward of the frontmost portion of the front bodywork/fascia as viewed from above. Splitters may not extend rearward past the centerline of the front wheels. No portion of the splitter may extend beyond the widest part of the front bumper/fascia or front wheel/tire as viewed from above (which ever is wider).

    I like that one best!!

     

    I'm not sure "C" is going to fly for Doug mentioned that the SEB was concerned about foot safety for people.

     


    Julia Aebersold
    97 SM
    97 Supra Turbo
  •  02-24-2008, 1:59 AM 286522 in reply to 286412

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    jaebers:
    EVOlutionary:

    Here is one in support of "C".

     M. Front splitters are allowed and shall be installed parallel to the ground (within +/-3 degrees fore to aft) and may extend a maximum of 6 inches forward of the frontmost portion of the bodywork/fascia as viewed from above. Splitters may not extend rearward past the centerline of the front wheels. No portion of the splitter may extend beyond the widest part of the front bumper/fascia as viewed from above.

    And here is a new idea:

     M. Front splitters are allowed and shall be installed parallel to the ground (within +/-3 degrees fore to aft) and may extend a maximum of 6 inches forward of the frontmost portion of the front bodywork/fascia as viewed from above. Splitters may not extend rearward past the centerline of the front wheels. No portion of the splitter may extend beyond the widest part of the front bumper/fascia or front wheel/tire as viewed from above (which ever is wider).

    I like that one best!!

     

    I'm not sure "C" is going to fly for Doug mentioned that the SEB was concerned about foot safety for people.

     

    Really? Maybe he needs to look at wings and eye-safety. 


    Aut tace aut loquere meliora silentio.
  •  02-24-2008, 11:28 PM 286627 in reply to 286522

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    modernbeat:
    jaebers:
    EVOlutionary:

    Here is one in support of "C".

     M. Front splitters are allowed and shall be installed parallel to the ground (within +/-3 degrees fore to aft) and may extend a maximum of 6 inches forward of the frontmost portion of the bodywork/fascia as viewed from above. Splitters may not extend rearward past the centerline of the front wheels. No portion of the splitter may extend beyond the widest part of the front bumper/fascia as viewed from above.

    And here is a new idea:

     M. Front splitters are allowed and shall be installed parallel to the ground (within +/-3 degrees fore to aft) and may extend a maximum of 6 inches forward of the frontmost portion of the front bodywork/fascia as viewed from above. Splitters may not extend rearward past the centerline of the front wheels. No portion of the splitter may extend beyond the widest part of the front bumper/fascia or front wheel/tire as viewed from above (which ever is wider).

    I like that one best!!

     

    I'm not sure "C" is going to fly for Doug mentioned that the SEB was concerned about foot safety for people.

     

    Really? Maybe he needs to look at wings and eye-safety. 

     

    Just quotin' the man.... 


    Julia Aebersold
    97 SM
    97 Supra Turbo
  •  04-17-2008, 3:38 PM 295832 in reply to 284914

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    I talked with Doug Gill and he said a clarification will be coming out in the next month's Fastrack.

    Julia Aebersold
    97 SM
    97 Supra Turbo
  •  04-21-2008, 1:31 AM 296133 in reply to 295832

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    It isn't a very lengthy clarification.  Just added the word "from" the body.  Implication is that you can be 6" from the body in any direction until you hit the "no wider than..." part.  That should put you at "B" at the beginning of the thread.  As long as you can draw a line from the edge of the splitter and hit the "as viewed from above" body line within 6", you are OK.

     

    -Andy M.

  •  04-29-2008, 10:39 PM 297723 in reply to 296133

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    Yep.  I agree with you that it implies "B".

    Julia Aebersold
    97 SM
    97 Supra Turbo
  •  04-30-2008, 6:49 AM 297749 in reply to 297723

    Re: Splitter Clarifications

    Well I am sure glad I decided to look at this thread again.  tore up my old splitter and was going to make a new one.  Son of a gun if my old one would not have met "B" anyway. 

    Hold my beer I got some work to do.


    Want to go faster, please send money.
Page 2 of 2 (39 items)   < Previous 1 2
View as RSS news feed in XML