SCCAForums.com

SCCA Racing Forums, Discussions and Blogs

Welcome to SCCAForums.com Sign in | Join | Latest Posts | My Posts | Help
in Search

Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

Last post 05-06-2008, 6:48 PM by Orthonormal. 392 replies.
Page 2 of 20 (393 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  10-05-2007, 9:45 PM 267041 in reply to 267029

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    I'd pick a Z06 (C5) for SS.  But then, I'm a cheapskate and like torque.

    If I had the money and a garage, I'd pick up an S2000 CR for A Stock.  I haven't driven a Cayman, but it seems that it and the 986 Boxster S are pretty close to equal, and they're probably not the car to have on most courses.

     


    John Vitamvas
    Overweight, one-wheel drive tire-eater
  •  10-06-2007, 1:48 AM 267062 in reply to 267041

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    Would be cool to see Sammy vs Paul & Lynne head to head in FS in the Shelby's..... but they are fords.... I think the GXP's look pretty competitive, one of the few cars I haven't driven. The STI in AS should also be very competitive, and you can pray for rain. STi's are alot of fun.... just get most of the way through the corner and flat-foot it out. throttle modulation? what's that? And Subie pays. Evos flop around the course like a fish out of water. Not sure what good an awd car is with only 3 wheels on the ground.

     BS... would go for a 350z instead of the monstrous torque of the RX-8... I've driven both and the torquey 350z is much more fun to drive. I haven't followed up on how they do on the course much though. RX-8 just feels like a HS car in acceleration - sorry Mazda guys. Plus is there is Mazda contingency money.

     I'm not stupid enough to bring my WU8 Z4C out of retirement against the Shelby's....I'll continue to run my C5 Z06 or beg, borrow, or steal a co-drive.


    Chapter 11 Racing
    Win or Go Broke Tryin'
    www.chapter11racing.com
  •  10-06-2007, 7:32 AM 267069 in reply to 267040

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    mattm:

    01 FS Z28:
    HS.  Why?  :)

    Why not? Six different cars in the six top positions. The winner wasn't known until the last run of day two.

    I don't think Sam was digging at the level of competition just the level of fun factor, especially considering what Paul and Lynne have been driving for the past 10 years. Big Smile  Chris Ramey, are you out there?

    "You're welcome to drive my car, but you probably won't like it." -- Marshall Cone about his HS Mini when I was trying to whore a ride at last year's Peru Pro

    Pat 

     


    '92 Sentra SE-R, daily driver and track car
    '82 Camaro Z28, ESP, 65% prepared, 50% ownership

    Upset about Stock class proposals? Get PISST!
  •  10-06-2007, 8:45 AM 267073 in reply to 267069

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    slowSER:
    mattm:

    01 FS Z28:
    HS.  Why?  :)

    Why not? Six different cars in the six top positions. The winner wasn't known until the last run of day two.

    I don't think Sam was digging at the level of competition just the level of fun factor, especially considering what Paul and Lynne have been driving for the past 10 years. Big Smile  Chris Ramey, are you out there?

    "You're welcome to drive my car, but you probably won't like it." -- Marshall Cone about his HS Mini when I was trying to whore a ride at last year's Peru Pro

    Pat 

     

     That is exactly why I didn't buy a Mazda 3 in '06.  While I was only slightly speedier in GS, I was coming out of a car that turned, stopped, didn't push, and could easily be driven by the gas pedal to move the rear.

    I know I rented a Mini ride to finish out last year, it wasn't my cup of joe, mainly because of the feeling of driving a phone booth and the pushiness.  All done since I didn't realize how competitive an EP car I had sitting in the garage.  That was an epiphany that came out as I saw my Thursday run 1 time, even though it was dirty.

    If I was going back to stock, I would be looking hard at either a ZOK Solstice or MSR MX-5 for CS.  Either of those two seem to be the best bang for buckage.


     


    Rob Foley

    no more Celica
    86 Civic EP
  •  10-06-2007, 11:37 AM 267098 in reply to 266986

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    Don't forget about the Impreza in HS.
    Trey Davis
    97 Subaru Impreza L, HS
    ETR
  •  10-07-2007, 5:32 PM 267171 in reply to 267000

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    MTBGAEL:
    I've been "told" they clear.  We'll definitely be test fitting soon.  FWIW 225/45 hankooks clear....but those are no where near as big.

    After GRM's latest tire test I am glad I got the 205/50R15 V710s for next year, but I'll probably have to learn how to shift to third. 


    Matthew Huizing
    1995 Saturn SC2 - H Stock
    1993 Geo Storm GSi - STS
  •  10-08-2007, 12:07 PM 267290 in reply to 267017

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    TeamRX8:
    the newer one appears to be faster, I'm only aware of there being a GSR 5 spd and MR 6 spd sequential for US-Spec, not an RS

    Hey Mark,

    Regardless on what article you read (some say the RS will be here in 08', some say 09'), the X/ RS is, in fact, out in Japan and more than likely will replace the Evo 9 RS here in the States.  Also, the GSR is suppose to have the 6sp SST option as well.  Sadly, it looks like the GSR and MR Evo X is heavier.

     

     Dave


    #76 STU Evo
  •  10-08-2007, 12:21 PM 267295 in reply to 266967

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    gary p:

    DS is unclear as well, mostly due to potential newcomers.  We haven't really seen yet what the new WRX can do. There's a new R32 Golf coming.  Wsa the TT there this year a new version?  If so was it a V6 quattro?  

    The TT was a 1.8T quattro...ALMS edition which gets you 18x8 wheels (I think it had 275 Hoosiers)


    Bryan
    2006 Chrysler Crossfire
    DS #187
    Yeah, seriously...A Chrysler
    2008 C6 Z51 waiting in the wings...
  •  10-08-2007, 12:40 PM 267300 in reply to 266950

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    Hey Paul,

    The MINI is the best car for HS and I'm willing to make the sacrifice and trade my top tier HS MINI and extended goodies for your 3rd tier AS Porsche Big Smile

     Jim

  •  10-08-2007, 1:04 PM 267304 in reply to 267069

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    slowSER:
    mattm:

    01 FS Z28:
    HS.  Why?  :)

    Why not? Six different cars in the six top positions. The winner wasn't known until the last run of day two.

    I don't think Sam was digging at the level of competition just the level of fun factor, especially considering what Paul and Lynne have been driving for the past 10 years. Big Smile  Chris Ramey, are you out there?

    "You're welcome to drive my car, but you probably won't like it." -- Marshall Cone about his HS Mini when I was trying to whore a ride at last year's Peru Pro

    Pat 

     

     

    The competition is great in HS.  I just don't really see them in an HS car (and I really am not a fan personally of cars that are that low powered).  The "why?" was directed to Paul and Lynne--my asking are if they really considering HS?  Probably could have been worded better.  Didn't mean to offend anyone.


    Sam Strano
    Owner--Strano Performance Parts
    800-729-1831
  •  10-08-2007, 1:36 PM 267312 in reply to 267304

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    That comment "you're welcome to drive my car, but you probably won't like it..."

    THat's the Cobalt SS to a tee :) ( or at least mine )

     This is something we have been talking about locally since I'm always wanting ideas for next year.

    Glad this is going on here :)


    Brian Huber
    2006 Cobalt SS-Supercharged
    #58DS
    Official car of One-Wheel Drive Racing's 2008 Solo campaign...
    If you aint last, then you aren't driving this car.
  •  10-08-2007, 2:52 PM 267329 in reply to 267304

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    01 FS Z28:

    The competition is great in HS.  I just don't really see them in an HS car (and I really am not a fan personally of cars that are that low powered).  The "why?" was directed to Paul and Lynne--my asking are if they really considering HS?  Probably could have been worded better.  Didn't mean to offend anyone.

     Isn't that what you asked me when we were talking about my choice of A Stock cars?

    "Why?"  Stick out tongue


    John Vitamvas
    Overweight, one-wheel drive tire-eater
  •  10-08-2007, 5:06 PM 267351 in reply to 267290

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    Silencer:

    TeamRX8:
    the newer one appears to be faster, I'm only aware of there being a GSR 5 spd and MR 6 spd sequential for US-Spec, not an RS

    Hey Mark,

    Regardless on what article you read (some say the RS will be here in 08', some say 09'), the X/ RS is, in fact, out in Japan and more than likely will replace the Evo 9 RS here in the States.  Also, the GSR is suppose to have the 6sp SST option as well.  Sadly, it looks like the GSR and MR Evo X is heavier.

     

     Dave

     

    Maybe you're confusing the Japan model line up with the US line up?  Japan gets the GSR with 5 sp manual or 6 spd SST, and then the RS with 5 spd manual.  For the US, the 5 spd manual will be called the GSR model and the 6 spd SST will be called the MR model.  Weight gain appears to not be as high as initially reported; +45 lbs for the GSR and + 100 lbs for the MR is what several of the latest test sources are reporting.  While weight increased overall, the chassis is signifiantly stiffer, the F/R balance is better, and the CG is lower.  Heavier is not necessarily worse, the handling improvement of the 2008 Evo over the 2006 IX seems to bear this out.

     The MR gets Eibach springs (and Bilstein shocks, shocks not an issue for most classes), not sure if that will be an option on the GSR.  The Jpn RS in addition to the radio/electronics/spoiler delete is missing items such as the Eibach springs, Recaro seats (no side bolsters), smaller wheels, etc. under the guise that racers will replace these items anyways.  In Jpn the RS also gets a S-AWC delete, so if this holds true for the US it may not be a contender for classes where these items can't be replaced/added.

    Too early for option lists and final configurations, so it's hard to pinpoint what exactly the US will be able to pick and choose from:

     http://media.mitsubishicars.com/detail?mid=MIT2007100143595&mime=ASC


    "Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car and oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
    Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you take the wall with you." --Anonymous
  •  10-08-2007, 6:20 PM 267365 in reply to 267351

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    One thing that I read in Motor Trend was that the GSR was going to get 18x8 inch wheels where as the MR would be getting 18x8.5 inch wheels.  So to get the wider wheels you need to get the more expensive car that weighs more and has the sequential gearbox which does not have a launch control function from what I have heard.  I wonder how that might affect the model choice atleast for stock class.
    Keith
    2005 Chrysler Crossfire-- DS
    1993 Subaru Legacy-- Rallycross car
  •  10-08-2007, 8:15 PM 267385 in reply to 267351

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    TeamRX8:
    The MR gets Eibach springs (and Bilstein shocks, shocks not an issue for most classes)

     I take it you haven't gone shopping for Evo IX replacement struts.  AFAIK, the only option is to ship the stock struts off to have them custom valved.  Not that it matters... the lack of camber, terrible body roll, and ridiculously expensive OEM clutch on the IX pushed me to BSP (would do STU but I'm addicted to R-comps).
     


    Dave Heinig

    07 GXP Z0K (Thanks Rob!)
  •  10-08-2007, 8:33 PM 267389 in reply to 267385

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    DaveH:

    TeamRX8:
    The MR gets Eibach springs (and Bilstein shocks, shocks not an issue for most classes)

     I take it you haven't gone shopping for Evo IX replacement struts.  AFAIK, the only option is to ship the stock struts off to have them custom valved.  Not that it matters... the lack of camber, terrible body roll, and ridiculously expensive OEM clutch on the IX pushed me to BSP (would do STU but I'm addicted to R-comps).
     

     

    It wouldn't be the first time I sacrificed a set of OE shocks to build a set of custom Koni DAs ....

     

    skeeter119:
    One thing that I read in Motor Trend was that the GSR was going to get 18x8 inch wheels where as the MR would be getting 18x8.5 inch wheels.  So to get the wider wheels you need to get the more expensive car that weighs more and has the sequential gearbox which does not have a launch control function from what I have heard.  I wonder how that might affect the model choice atleast for stock class.

     

    I saw that too, but the Mitsubishi link I supplied above listing the initial US-Specs indicates otherwise.  I think the 8" GSR wheels may have been a Jpn deal, and I think that the other wheels are still a stand-alone option there

    The reason the SST is not available yet is because they're still working out the final launch software for it, it likely won't launch from a standing start as hard as the manual trans


    "Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car and oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
    Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you take the wall with you." --Anonymous
  •  10-08-2007, 9:36 PM 267410 in reply to 267389

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    TeamRX8:

    The reason the SST is not available yet is because they're still working out the final launch software for it, it likely won't launch from a standing start as hard as the manual trans

     

    I wonder if a factory programmed launch control might be an asset for Pro Solo, even if its a little soft, because of consistancy.  I would think that once you dial it in for a particular surface you should be able to cut a good light.   


    Once you go Mac, you never go back!
  •  10-08-2007, 9:58 PM 267420 in reply to 266950

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    Well, respectfully.....  If you are going to pick a car based on it's competitiveness in class and limit it to stock classes, it seems like you might not have asked the right question....

     

    Ignoring street use as a reason to buy a car, it seems like the ES MR2 is the best bang for buck, closest to a sure thing overdog we have right now.  I say this because they are relatively cheap compared to anything else on the list, and I don't think anyone will argue there is a less disputable "car to have for the class" on your list.


     


    WTB: CSP Spyder parts. What you got?
  •  10-08-2007, 10:55 PM 267433 in reply to 267420

    • jzr is not online. Last active: 09/05/2008, 1:47 AM jzr
    • Top 75 Contributor
    • Joined on 10-20-2002
    • San Diego, CA
    • Posts 798
    • Points 11,610

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    Is the 2008 SRT-10 going to SS?
    --Jason Rhoades
  •  10-09-2007, 12:17 AM 267451 in reply to 267433

    Re: Best Cars For 2008 Stock Classes

    more power is just what a Viper needs Stick out tongue

     

     

    gary p:
    TeamRX8:

    The reason the SST is not available yet is because they're still working out the final launch software for it, it likely won't launch from a standing start as hard as the manual trans

     

    I wonder if a factory programmed launch control might be an asset for Pro Solo, even if its a little soft, because of consistancy.  I would think that once you dial it in for a particular surface you should be able to cut a good light.   

     

    like the no-motion lower rev limiter (not really launch control, though people call it that) on the manual trans car, it is only intended to protect the drivetrain from being excessively shocked, not to provide optimum launching

    I would think you'd launch the SST just like a DSG; hold the brake and gas down simultaneously and then lift off the brake to launch when the tree comes down.  It likely would be consistent, though possibly consistent and slower off the line.  Missed up/down shifts would be a think of the past as would being in the wrong gear at the wrong time if you believe the SST reports so far


    "Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car and oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
    Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you take the wall with you." --Anonymous
Page 2 of 20 (393 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
View as RSS news feed in XML