SCCAForums.com

SCCA Racing Forums, Discussions and Blogs

Welcome to SCCAForums.com Sign in | Join | Latest Posts | My Posts | Help
in Search

SM2 - Nationals attendance

Last post 07-31-2008, 12:53 PM by JCN. 157 replies.
Page 2 of 8 (158 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  09-21-2007, 1:16 PM 264905 in reply to 264756

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    marka:

    I'm not sure what you can do to address this rules-wise without a lot more SM classes.  There are a lot of people out there like me as regards having an uncompetitive SM car, but we're all uncompetitive for different reasons.  Whatever set of allowances you come up with is likely to work just as poorly at making us all have a shot as the current ones do.

    Very true. Hence Erik's post. It seems like dramatic changes to the rules usually just changes the group of folks who are unhappy. We are always happy to read letters with suggestions, and do take the suggestions seriously. :)

    SM classes shouldn't be seen any different than other classes. As much as we try to make 1000 different cars equal, there will be a list that rise to the top. I'd argue that list hasn't even been established in SM2. When you want to build a competitive national car for any class (even stock), most folks look at what chassis are already competitive in the class, not what is currently in their garage. I believe the more modifications allowed, the wider the pool of possible top-dog cars exists, because you can fix shortcomings. I believe any gen MR2 or Miata, 914, even a 300zx can be made competitive. If you're too heavy, add more motor and tire. Too light, build a high-comp NA motor. If you think the weight/displacement rules are horribly inequitable, write us! :)


    Randy Noll
  •  10-08-2007, 3:10 AM 267235 in reply to 264668

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    SpyderVenom:

    IMHO, the things that are killing the class:  Open boost in SP (this is where locally the classes were getting people who chipped cars), it's proximity to XP (if a National competitor already has a dedicated trailered car, why not use the better weights in XP and non-DOT slicks), rules instability, and the money/time/effort to make a National level car. 

     

    There's always something more to the story than just the end results, but Berry in BSP scoring a better combined time than Daddio in SM should at least open some eyes ...


    "Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car and oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
    Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you take the wall with you." --Anonymous
  •  10-08-2007, 7:57 AM 267247 in reply to 267235

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    TeamRX8:

     

    There's always something more to the story than just the end results, but Berry in BSP scoring a better combined time than Daddio in SM should at least open some eyes ...

     

    different days/heats. cannot be a direct comparison.  


    Hi! I'm Rodney. "Hi Rodney!" I'm addicted to Solo....
  •  10-08-2007, 12:15 PM 267292 in reply to 264123

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    ChrisSwearingen:
    Having 17 might not save it, but having only 16 will kill it.

     Sheesh,

    I know there's plenty running in the local classes.

    If I had know it was this close, I would have showed up, even with my stock 134k mile drivetrain and bushings.

    So, how many wound up attending?


    Polo Green 95 LT1 6-spd Chevy Corvette
    Upgrading as stuff wears out and/or breaks
    Autocross / Road / Drag in whatever class they decide to stick me in this week!
    2000 CCM Group IIG Autocross Champ
    Member: NCCC, NCM, SCCA, NHRA, CART
  •  10-08-2007, 12:27 PM 267297 in reply to 267292

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    BrianCunningham:
    So, how many wound up attending?

    19 open and ladies. 


    Rob Leone

    '07 Solstice GXP in AS
    '87 Toyota Corolla in EP
    ex - '91 MR2 Turbo in SM2 <- If you can't set a good example, serve as a horrible warning.
  •  10-08-2007, 12:36 PM 267299 in reply to 267292

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    Guys, let's not get too doom and gloom.   We met numbers this year so SM2 is not on the chopping block.   However, we are expected to work on making the class grow since meeting the minimum number is not exactly a resounding success story. 

     The SMAC has taken a more "rules stability" approach this year in the understanding that competitors are tired of being jerked around, something we sympathize with.  It is too late for any rules changes for 2008, so I'd next expect any proposals to come out early next year.  My guess is that the SMAC will at least be discussing the weight scales and any fine adjustments that might be needed (note that any changes wouldn't be effective until 2009). 

     -Andy M.

  •  10-08-2007, 12:43 PM 267301 in reply to 264749

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    Joe_914:

    I like the thought of classed by how much money you spent.

    Overdogs????  I can think of a couple SM2 overdogs  one is black and one is red. If there is less than 80K in either of the two cars I will eat my 914 piece by piece.

    Sm  the class of cubic dollars   

    XP  where SM left off.

    Joe,

    Andy's car can be bought for mid-$40K's right now.  So, you could make a nice profit selling off the $80k+ in parts...Rollseyes


    Erik Strelnieks
    93 3-ROTOR RX7
    01 Honda S2000
    05 SLK 350 AMG
    08 BMW 135i
  •  10-08-2007, 1:57 PM 267316 in reply to 267235

    • sm2dan is not online. Last active: 08/29/2008, 5:58 PM sm2dan
    • Top 100 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 12-26-2000
    • Round Rock, Texas. y'all
    • Posts 632
    • Points 7,960

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    TeamRX8:
    SpyderVenom:

    IMHO, the things that are killing the class:  Open boost in SP (this is where locally the classes were getting people who chipped cars), it's proximity to XP (if a National competitor already has a dedicated trailered car, why not use the better weights in XP and non-DOT slicks), rules instability, and the money/time/effort to make a National level car. 

     

    There's always something more to the story than just the end results, but Berry in BSP scoring a better combined time than Daddio in SM should at least open some eyes ...

    Absolutely.

    It probably means that BSP Evo needs to go to ASP.


    Dan Pedroza
    GS 127
    WikiWiki!
  •  10-08-2007, 1:58 PM 267318 in reply to 267301

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    ErikZ06:
    Joe_914:

    I like the thought of classed by how much money you spent.

    Overdogs????  I can think of a couple SM2 overdogs  one is black and one is red. If there is less than 80K in either of the two cars I will eat my 914 piece by piece.

    Sm  the class of cubic dollars   

    XP  where SM left off.

    Joe,

    Andy's car can be bought for mid-$40K's right now.  So, you could make a nice profit selling off the $80k+ in parts...Rollseyes

     

    Mid 40's?  Asking price is a mere mid-30's Wink.    In any case Joe, you might want to start eating.  If you'll recall on another one of the SM2 lengthy threads I also laid out how I'd build an RX-7, and total was in the 30's.  Don't let the fact that SM2 cars are faster in the dry at HPT than any other car short of Mod mislead you into thinking they are uber expensive.

     -Andy M.

  •  10-08-2007, 8:58 PM 267397 in reply to 267247

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    Rodney:
    TeamRX8:

     

    There's always something more to the story than just the end results, but Berry in BSP scoring a better combined time than Daddio in SM should at least open some eyes ...

     

    different days/heats. cannot be a direct comparison.  

     

    apparently you skipped the first part of my reply ...


    "Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car and oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
    Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you take the wall with you." --Anonymous
  •  10-09-2007, 11:58 AM 267506 in reply to 267316

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    sm2dan:
    TeamRX8:
    SpyderVenom:

    IMHO, the things that are killing the class:  Open boost in SP (this is where locally the classes were getting people who chipped cars), it's proximity to XP (if a National competitor already has a dedicated trailered car, why not use the better weights in XP and non-DOT slicks), rules instability, and the money/time/effort to make a National level car. 

     

    There's always something more to the story than just the end results, but Berry in BSP scoring a better combined time than Daddio in SM should at least open some eyes ...

    Absolutely.

    It probably means that BSP Evo needs to go to ASP.

    There are plenty of other evos that are in BSP that aren't doing as well.  So you're suggesting that we limit Tom to ASP regardless of what car he's driving?

  •  10-09-2007, 12:03 PM 267508 in reply to 267506

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    How did Tom do against guys like Harold Olsen when he was in BSP a few years ago in his 'vette? I know Tom is particular about prepping his cars and was very fast in that 'vette, but I don't think he put the distance on the field like he has in the Evo.
    Brian "Big Enos" Burdette
  •  10-09-2007, 12:11 PM 267511 in reply to 267508

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    Guys, this was a SM2 thread, not a Captain Obvious Evo's are an overdog in BSP thread. 

    -Andy M.

     

     

  •  10-09-2007, 4:13 PM 267540 in reply to 267506

    • sm2dan is not online. Last active: 08/29/2008, 5:58 PM sm2dan
    • Top 100 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 12-26-2000
    • Round Rock, Texas. y'all
    • Posts 632
    • Points 7,960

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    Marshall Grice:
    sm2dan:
    TeamRX8:
    SpyderVenom:

    IMHO, the things that are killing the class:  Open boost in SP (this is where locally the classes were getting people who chipped cars), it's proximity to XP (if a National competitor already has a dedicated trailered car, why not use the better weights in XP and non-DOT slicks), rules instability, and the money/time/effort to make a National level car. 

     

    There's always something more to the story than just the end results, but Berry in BSP scoring a better combined time than Daddio in SM should at least open some eyes ...

    Absolutely.

    It probably means that BSP Evo needs to go to ASP.

    There are plenty of other evos that are in BSP that aren't doing as well.  So you're suggesting that we limit Tom to ASP regardless of what car he's driving?

    How others do in an Evo is irrelevent to classing.  Classing of vehicles is based on the greatest potential of that vehicle.


    Dan Pedroza
    GS 127
    WikiWiki!
  •  10-09-2007, 5:46 PM 267559 in reply to 267540

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    Is anyone (non-SMAC/SEB) who ran SM2 at nationals following this thread?

    I always appreciate the comments from everyone who's participated--your thoughts are always helpful--but I'm starting to wonder if the majority of SM/SM2 even reads this forum anymore. I'd be curious to know what some of the guys who haven't chimed in yet are thinking... about SM2.


    Randy Noll
  •  10-09-2007, 8:25 PM 267596 in reply to 267511

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    boxboy:

    Guys, this was a SM2 thread, not a Captain Obvious Evo's are an overdog in BSP thread. 

    -Andy M.

     

    Sorry Andy.  I was only attempting to support the idea that open boost in SP has likely impacted SM/SM2 participation to some degree.  I honestly don't think that impact was considered at the time it went through.

    Mark


    "Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car and oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
    Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you take the wall with you." --Anonymous
  •  10-09-2007, 9:21 PM 267604 in reply to 267596

    • sm2dan is not online. Last active: 08/29/2008, 5:58 PM sm2dan
    • Top 100 Contributor
      Male
    • Joined on 12-26-2000
    • Round Rock, Texas. y'all
    • Posts 632
    • Points 7,960

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    TeamRX8:
    boxboy:

    Guys, this was a SM2 thread, not a Captain Obvious Evo's are an overdog in BSP thread. 

    -Andy M.

     

    Sorry Andy.  I was only attempting to support the idea that open boost in SP has likely impacted SM/SM2 participation to some degree.  I honestly don't think that impact was considered at the time it went through.

    Mark

    That's a really good observation and certainly has merits.  I know that Michael Wootton flirted with SM2 with his Mazdaspeed Miata but then figured BSP might be a better fit in the short run.  By the limits of even SP rules, it's conceivable to have that Miata acquire same power levels as my old SC Miata, have much better wheels/tires and much better brakes and stay in BSP instead of having to do battle against the Uber RX7s.  Wow.  Makes me wanna consider BSP!


    Dan Pedroza
    GS 127
    WikiWiki!
  •  10-09-2007, 9:51 PM 267612 in reply to 267559

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    rnoll98:

    Is anyone (non-SMAC/SEB) who ran SM2 at nationals following this thread?

    I always appreciate the comments from everyone who's participated--your thoughts are always helpful--but I'm starting to wonder if the majority of SM/SM2 even reads this forum anymore. I'd be curious to know what some of the guys who haven't chimed in yet are thinking... about SM2.

     Following it, heck I started it.

     
    I am glad to see the class stick around another year.  Motor plans are already in progress for more power next year.  I will continue to lobby for lighter competition weights for small displacement vehicles.  Or some more equitable ballasting adjustments at the least.  Adding weight in the trunk of a Miata is not a favorable solution. 

    I knew the rules when I got in so I can live with them, but if you want more guys to come play, I think the forced induction Miata community would be interested.  But that interest would be higher if they could shed some weight.  The 275 hoosiers give us some opportunities, but we still need a bit more to be competitive.  I wouldn't mind tailoring the class to make Miata's the overdog, but my intent is to give them more equity and make them competitive.  Either that or make all rotaries weigh <dr evil voice> 1 million pounds </dr evil voice>

    The rules as they are won't keep me away, but they may be keeping some others.  Just my $.02
     


    Chris
    51 SM2
  •  10-09-2007, 10:26 PM 267617 in reply to 267596

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    TeamRX8:
    Sorry
    In other news, I think this is the first time in recorded history that Mark apologized for something he said on the internet. 
  •  10-10-2007, 11:17 PM 267840 in reply to 267316

    Re: SM2 - Nationals attendance

    Ya just bump all the AWDs to ASP and make a FWD SM class and we'll be all set ;) 

    sm2dan:
    TeamRX8:
    SpyderVenom:

    IMHO, the things that are killing the class:  Open boost in SP (this is where locally the classes were getting people who chipped cars), it's proximity to XP (if a National competitor already has a dedicated trailered car, why not use the better weights in XP and non-DOT slicks), rules instability, and the money/time/effort to make a National level car. 

     

    There's always something more to the story than just the end results, but Berry in BSP scoring a better combined time than Daddio in SM should at least open some eyes ...

    Absolutely.

    It probably means that BSP Evo needs to go to ASP.


    David Hedderick
    Pearland (Houston), TX
    01 CRG YZ125 (FOR SALE! $2500)
    08 Mazda 3s
    02 Mazda Protege (automatic tow vehicle)
    92 Miata SE - Fun half-arsed STS2 Car
Page 2 of 8 (158 items)   < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
View as RSS news feed in XML